Quick hits
What moved, in brief.
Washington will not renew the USMCA
The USMCA Free Trade Commission met on 1 July for the joint review written into the agreement, and the United States declined to renew it in its current form. The pact stays in force pending a resolution, and a third round of US-Mexico bilateral talks is set for the week of 20 July. For anyone who has spent three years selling nearshoring on the strength of a stable North American rulebook, the pitch now needs a scenario range rather than a certainty.
USTR: Ambassador Greer issues statement on the USMCA joint reviewThe UK-India trade deal goes live on Wednesday
The free trade agreement signed in July 2025 enters into force on 15 July, cutting tariffs across goods and opening procurement and services channels between the two economies. Trade officers on both sides have one week to get exporters ready to actually claim the preferences: the paperwork for rules-of-origin certification is where most first-year benefit gets left on the table.
House of Commons Library: Progress on UK free trade agreement negotiationsSouth Africa puts its zones on the stand
The dtic hosts the International Special Zones Infrastructure and Investment Conference in Durban on 16 and 17 July, with the first SEZ Achievement Awards attached. The programme's running tally: R31bn of investment from 224 companies and more than 28,000 direct jobs. Modest against the promises made when the zones were launched, and a useful reminder that a zone is an operating business, not a designation.
dtic: SA special economic zones to battle it out for top honours in inaugural achievement awardsData centres now take a fifth of global greenfield capital
Announced FDI into data centres passed $270bn in 2025 and accounted for more than a fifth of all greenfield project value worldwide, on UNCTAD's preliminary count. Malaysia, Brazil, India and Thailand were named as emerging destinations. If your agency is chasing this, the questions that decide it are power, water and grid connection dates, not incentives.
UNCTAD: Data centres are reshaping the global investment landscapeTokyo and Delhi put a number on the next decade
The 16th India-Japan annual summit, held in New Delhi from 1 to 3 July during Prime Minister Takaichi's first visit, produced around 129 corporate agreements and a target of mobilising 10 trillion yen of Japanese investment into India over ten years, with a joint roadmap on semiconductors, quantum, clean energy and supply chains. Targets of this kind are political scaffolding. What they do reliably create is a queue of Japanese firms with a mandate to look, and that queue is worth meeting.
ANI: India, Japan target mobilising 10 trillion yen in Japanese investment into India over next decadeThe bravest number an IPA can publish is what happened to the projects it already won
MIDA's annual conference led with a record RM426.7bn of approvals. Buried further down was something far rarer and far more useful: an audit of what became of five years of them. Most agencies do not track this. The ones that do get better at their job, for reasons that have nothing to do with the press release.
Investment promotion has a measurement problem that everyone in the profession knows about and almost nobody fixes. Agencies are funded, judged and rewarded on what they announce. The announcement is a promise: a board decision, a letter of intent, an approved incentive package, a number read out at a podium. Whether the plant gets built is somebody else's problem, usually two ministers and three years later. The gap between the two is where credibility quietly drains away, and it is why finance ministries have grown sceptical of promotion budgets.
Malaysia has started closing that gap in public. At its annual media conference in March, the Malaysian Investment Development Authority reported RM426.7bn of approved investments for 2025, an 11% rise and the highest on record, across 8,390 projects with 244,902 jobs attached. That is the headline any agency would lead with. What MIDA did next is the interesting part. It reported that of the 4,848 manufacturing projects approved by the National Committee on Investment between 2021 and 2025, 84.9% have reached some stage of implementation, whether producing, building the factory or installing machinery. Twelve per cent are still in planning, working through site selection and developer talks. And 3.1% were abandoned outright.
Consider what it takes to publish that last figure. Every abandoned project was once a win. Somebody flew to a headquarters, negotiated a package, secured a signature and put out a release. To then go back and mark it as dead, in an official document, in front of a press corps and an opposition, is an act of institutional self-discipline that most promotion agencies would never survive internally. MIDA also disclosed that projects approved in 2025 are only 62.2% implemented, which sounds bad until you note the agency's own explanation: manufacturing projects typically need 18 to 24 months to move from approval to ground, so a fresh cohort should look unfinished. That, too, is a number that invites attack and holds up under it.
The discipline exists because Malaysia was forced into it. Local economists have spent years pointing out that MIDA's approved foreign investment is not the same thing as the foreign direct investment the statistics department records in the balance of payments, and that conflating the two flatters the government. It is a fair criticism, and MIDA now prints an explainer of the difference at the bottom of its own press releases. The realisation rate is the answer to the criticism. If you are going to report approvals, you owe the public an account of how many of them turn into concrete.
The measurement then changes the behaviour, which is the real argument for it. Once an agency is accountable for realisation rather than approval, everything downstream of the signature stops being someone else's job. Malaysia's answer is a stack of facilitation machinery that only makes sense if you are being graded on completions: the National Committee on Investment, the Invest Malaysia Facilitation Centre, an Investment and Trade Coordination Action Committee, a data centre task force run jointly with the digital ministry, and a talent facilitation task force pulling in 17 ministries and academic institutions because the projects were stalling on engineers. None of that is glamorous. All of it exists to move projects from the 12% column to the 84.9% one.
There is a caution here, and practitioners should hold it alongside the praise. A realisation rate can be gamed as easily as any other metric, by defining implementation loosely, by quietly dropping projects from the denominator, or by approving only the safe ones. Malaysia's own categories are broad: machinery installation counts, and so does factory construction. But a soft number published is still worth more than a hard number withheld, because publishing it creates a constituency inside the agency for the boring post-approval work that nobody gets promoted for. Most agencies could construct their own version this quarter from files they already hold. Very few will, because the first honest answer is likely to be embarrassing. That is exactly why it is worth having.
Status of the 4,848 manufacturing projects approved by Malaysia's National Committee on Investment, 2021 to 2025. Implementation includes projects in production, in factory construction and in machinery installation. Projects approved in 2025 alone sit at 62.2% implementation, consistent with an 18 to 24 month build cycle. Source: MIDA Annual Media Conference, 6 March 2026.
Why it matters for practitioners
- ◆Report a realisation rate, not just a pipeline. Take one closed cohort, the projects you approved or announced three years ago, and classify every one of them: in production, under construction, still planning, dead. That single table tells your minister more about your agency than any annual total, and it is the only credible defence of a promotion budget when the finance ministry comes looking.
- ◆Name the owner of the post-approval journey. Realisation rates only move if somebody is accountable for the eighteen months after the signature. Malaysia stood up a facilitation centre, a coordination committee and a talent task force spanning 17 institutions precisely because that is where projects were dying. If nobody in your organisation is graded on completions, nobody is doing this work.
- ◆Publish the denominator and define your terms. A realisation rate is only honest if you say what counts as implemented, what counts as abandoned, and how many projects were in the cohort. Loose definitions and a disappearing denominator turn the metric into a second press release.
- ◆What to do this week: pull the list of projects your agency announced in 2023 and call each company. Ask one question, whether the facility is operating, and record the answer. You will have a realisation rate by Friday and a retention list by Monday, because the firms that stalled are the ones a competitor is currently courting. The Doyen thread on aftercare as a pipeline has the call script.
Sources
- MIDA: Malaysia breaks investment record with RM426.7 billion in 2025
- MIDA: Annual Media Conference 2026 media release (PDF)
- The Edge Malaysia: Approved investments versus FDI — manipulation or truly a non-issue?
- USTR: Ambassador Greer issues statement on the USMCA joint review
- House of Commons Library: Progress on UK free trade agreement negotiations
- dtic: SA special economic zones to battle it out for top honours in inaugural achievement awards
- UNCTAD: Data centres are reshaping the global investment landscape
- ANI: India, Japan target mobilising 10 trillion yen in Japanese investment into India over next decade
- BusinessToday: India-Japan summit — 129 MoUs signed, 10 trillion yen investment target set
Get the Brief in your inbox
Free. Each issue, the day it publishes.